PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
GLLSX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).

GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLLSX or ^GSPC.

Correlation

The correlation between GLLSX and ^GSPC is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GLLSX:

7.03%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

GLLSX:

-0.49%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

GLLSX:

0.00%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

GLLSX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

5.53%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.61%

10Y*

10.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLLSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLLSX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Drawdowns

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

GLLSX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...